Numbers are Great for Calendars – Not for Grading Girls!
Oh man, she was an 8.5!
The grading system. Most of us know it, many of us use it. Rating girls from numbers 1-10 based on their looks…
Isn’t it extremely childish? I think so.
Whenever I hear a man talking about that 6, 7, or the rare 10, I just shake my head. Ratings girls is for boys. Not for men.
Because grading is really all about acceptance. You only get high-fived by your pals if she’s an “8”.
Seeking others acceptance is a bad trait. It’s a big red sign of insecurity. And what’s the opposite of insecurity? Confidence.
And what is the number one trait that women look after in a man? Right. Confidence.
My 9.2 could be your 7.6
Just because you think that someone looks good doesn’t mean that I will. And that’s another flaw of this “system”.
Because really, who cares about what I think about the girl that you like?
Stop all the grading and rating.
Numbers are great for calendars. Numbers dictate a lot of stuff in our lives.
But they shouldn’t have anything to say about who we choose to be with!
So I present to you a new system
It’s so revolutionary, you can’t even imagine.
What about grading girls by a yes, a maybe or a no?
If she’s a yes, go get her tiger.
If she’s a no, don’t worry about her.
But if she’s a maybe – you have to change her to either a yes or a no! And how do you do that?
You go over and talk to her!
Simple as that. Find out if she’s a yes or a no. How will you ever know anyway? Going over to talk to her is the only way to be sure. She might have a great personality, a smile you didn’t notice right away, or something else.
If you have talked for a little while, and still isn’t sure, just get her number. Take her out to coffee someday day and continue the conversation. It really is that easy.
What do you think?
Let’s start up a little discussion in the comments – Is it childish, or is it perfectly OK to rate girls?
If yes, why?
Get more insight to the world of success with women by subscribing to the RSS feed.
* The “yes, maybe, no” system was not “invented” by me. I first heard it in a David Wygant podcast.